↓ Skip to main content

Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England
Published in
Lancet Oncology, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70041-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Richard D Neal, Josephine M Barbiere, Gregory P Rubin, Gary A Abel

Abstract

Information from patient surveys can help to identify patient groups and cancers with the greatest potential for improvement in the experience and timeliness of cancer diagnosis. We aimed to examine variation in the number of pre-referral consultations with a general practitioner between patients with different cancers and sociodemographic characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 297 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 17%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Master 40 13%
Other 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 85 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#817,470
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#1,030
of 6,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,725
of 172,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#5
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.