| Title |
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient–Physician Non-English Language Concordance on Quality of Care and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Diamond, Karen Izquierdo, Dana Canfield, Konstantina Matsoukas, Francesca Gany |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 362 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 20% |
| Unknown | 152 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 167 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#147,812
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#137
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,833
of 367,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.