↓ Skip to main content

Repair of CDH during ECLS

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repair of CDH during ECLS
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/ans.13466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudesh Prabhu, Adrian C Mattke, Ben Anderson, Craig McBride, Lucy Cooke, Tom Karl, Nelson Alphonso

Abstract

The management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in neonates has evolved considerably over the last three decades. Initial stabilization followed by surgical repair is the current standard of care. A subset fails to achieve adequate oxygenation with medical management, including the use of high frequency oscillation and inhaled nitric oxide. The mortality in this group exceeds 80% without additional management strategies. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a well-established modality for managing these neonates with CDH and has been shown to improve early survival in selected cases. This is a retrospective analysis of six neonates with CDH who underwent repair during ECLS between September 2011 and November 2014. Of 24 admissions with CDH, there were six neonates (25%) who required ECLS. All the six had CDH repair during ECLS. There were no intra-operative bleeding complications. There were no clotting complications related to stopping heparin during CDH repair. There was one hospital death. Five neonates were weaned from ECLS and discharged home. Data from our small cohort of patients illustrate that early survival is possible in extremely compromised neonates who otherwise would have died without ECLS. Our experience demonstrates that CDH repair can safely be performed during ECLS. Use of ECLS, early repair during ECLS, lung protective ventilation strategies and aggressive management of pulmonary hypertension were associated with good early survival. ECLS should be considered as an integral part of therapeutic armamentarium for CDH in neonates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Chemistry 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,783,193
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,044
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,510
of 314,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#10
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.