↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab in Chronic Kidney Disease in the FOURIER Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab in Chronic Kidney Disease in the FOURIER Trial
Published in
JACC, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.513
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Charytan, Marc S. Sabatine, Terje R. Pedersen, KyungAh Im, Jeong-Gun Park, Armando Lira Pineda, Scott M. Wasserman, Prakash Deedwania, Anders G. Olsson, Peter S. Sever, Anthony C. Keech, Robert P. Giugliano, FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 46 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 50 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#858,675
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,159
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,832
of 363,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#75
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.