| Title |
Comparison of the microbiomes of two drinking water distribution systems—with and without residual chloramine disinfection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-019-0707-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael B. Waak, Raymond M. Hozalski, Cynthia Hallé, Timothy M. LaPara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 26% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,599,303
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,022
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,640
of 370,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.