↓ Skip to main content

Auditory deprivation and health in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Maturitas, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditory deprivation and health in the elderly
Published in
Maturitas, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Cherko, Louise Hickson, Mahmood Bhutta

Abstract

Age-related hearing loss is a common disorder with important consequences for quality of life. We performed a systematic review of the evidence investigating the effect of age-related hearing loss on cognition and quality of life in the elderly, and evaluated the effect of interventions for hearing loss. There is a large body of evidence associating hearing loss with detriment to physical and mental health, cognition, independence, social interaction and quality of life in the elderly. Hearing rehabilitation programmes, hearing aids and cochlear implants show beneficial effects in restoring communicative ability in this group and subsequently improve quality of life. Furthermore, much of the benefit seen is comparable to that in younger adults. However, both identifying those at need of such interventions and implementing them effectively are sub-optimal. Treatment approaches that better address the difficulties within this group need to be developed and the role significant others have to play in hearing rehabilitation should be explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 45 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 55 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#1,060
of 2,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,552
of 314,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#25
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.