↓ Skip to main content

Reducing sampling bias in molecular studies of grapevine fruit ripening: transcriptomic assessment of the density sorting method

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Reducing sampling bias in molecular studies of grapevine fruit ripening: transcriptomic assessment of the density sorting method
Published in
Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40626-016-0059-5
Authors

Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano, Virginia Rodríguez, Silvia Hernáiz, Carolina Royo, Silvia Dal Santo, Mario Pezzotti, José Miguel Martínez-Zapater

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,842,329
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology
#35
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,674
of 299,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.