↓ Skip to main content

Monte Carlo radiative transfer

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Monte Carlo radiative transfer
Published in
Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s41115-019-0004-9
Authors

Ulrich M. Noebauer, Stuart A. Sim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 36%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 43 57%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,321,456
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics
#3
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,539
of 369,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them