You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven R Corsi, Laura A De Cicco, Daniel L Villeneuve, Brett R Blackwell, Kellie A Fay, Gerald T Ankley, Austin K Baldwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#14,808
of 29,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,823
of 366,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#373
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.