↓ Skip to main content

Leg- vs arm-cycling repeated sprints with blood flow restriction and systemic hypoxia

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Leg- vs arm-cycling repeated sprints with blood flow restriction and systemic hypoxia
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04171-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J. Willis, Fabio Borrani, Grégoire P. Millet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 44 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 49 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,742,701
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#873
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,951
of 368,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.