| Title |
Erratum to: The phenotypic spectrum of organic acidurias and urea cycle disorders. Part 2: the evolving clinical phenotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10545-015-9868-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Kölker, Vassili Valayannopoulos, Alberto B. Burlina, Jolanta Sykut‐Cegielska, Frits A. Wijburg, Elisa Leão Teles, Jiri Zeman, Carlo Dionisi‐Vici, Ivo Barić, Daniela Karall, Jean‐Baptiste Arnoux, Paula Avram, Matthias R. Baumgartner, Javier Blasco‐Alonso, S. P. Nikolas Boy, Marlene Bøgehus Rasmussen, Peter Burgard, Brigitte Chabrol, Anupam Chakrapani, Kimberly Chapman, Elisenda Cortès i Saladelafont, Maria L. Couce, Linda de Meirleir, Dries Dobbelaere, Francesca Furlan, Florian Gleich, Maria Julieta González, Wanda Gradowska, Stephanie Grünewald, Tomas Honzik, Friederike Hörster, Hariklea Ioannou, Anil Jalan, Johannes Häberle, Gisela Haege, Eveline Langereis, Pascale de Lonlay, Diego Martinelli, Shirou Matsumoto, Chris Mühlhausen, Elaine Murphy, Hélène Ogier de Baulny, Carlos Ortez, Consuelo C. Pedrón, Guillem Pintos‐Morell, Luis Pena‐Quintana, Danijela Petković Ramadža, Esmeralda Rodrigues, Sabine Scholl‐Bürgi, Etienne Sokal, Marshall L. Summar, Nicholas Thompson, Roshni Vara, Inmaculada Vives Pinera, John H. Walter, Monique Williams, Allan M. Lund, Angeles Garcia Cazorla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,364,458
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1,474
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,040
of 239,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.