↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of the prevalence and risk factors of complications in intracranial tumor embolization between the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 2 (JR-NET2) and JR-NET3

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of the prevalence and risk factors of complications in intracranial tumor embolization between the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 2 (JR-NET2) and JR-NET3
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00701-019-03970-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomohito Hishikawa, Kenji Sugiu, Satoshi Murai, Yu Takahashi, Naoya Kidani, Shingo Nishihiro, Masafumi Hiramatsu, Isao Date, Tetsu Satow, Koji Iihara, Nobuyuki Sakai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,662,372
of 23,859,750 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#584
of 2,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,992
of 356,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#64
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,859,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,007 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.