↓ Skip to main content

Immediate percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion for unstable pelvic fractures: is it safe enough?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Immediate percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion for unstable pelvic fractures: is it safe enough?
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00068-016-0654-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Acker, Z. H. Perry, S. Blum, G. Shaked, A. Korngreen

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of immediate and delayed percutaneous sacroiliac screws surgery for unstable pelvic fractures, regarding technical results and complication rate. Retrospective study. The study was conducted at the Soroka University Medical center, Beer Sheva, Israel, which is a level 1 trauma Center. 108 patients with unstable pelvic injuries were operated by the orthopedic department at the Soroka University Medical Center between the years 1999-2010. A retrospective analysis found 50 patients with immediate surgery and 58 patients with delayed surgery. Preoperative and postoperative imaging were analyzed and data was collected regarding complications. All patients were operated on by using the same technique-percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac joint with cannulated screws. The study's primary outcome measure was the safety and quality of the early operation in comparison with the late operation. A total of 156 sacroiliac screws were inserted. No differences were found between the immediate and delayed treatment groups regarding technical outcome measures (P value = 0.44) and complication rate (P value = 0.42). The current study demonstrated that immediate percutaneous sacroiliac screw insertion for unstable pelvic fractures produced equally good technical results, in comparison with the conventional delayed operation, without additional complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 16%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 11 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 13 52%