Title |
Metagenomic screening of microbiomes identifies pathogen-enriched environments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12302-019-0217-x |
Authors |
Xiaofang Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 32% |
Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,814,009
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#163
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,809
of 357,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.