↓ Skip to main content

Geography of conservation spending, biodiversity, and culture

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geography of conservation spending, biodiversity, and culture
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12720
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.R. McClanahan, P.S. Rankin

Abstract

We examined the associations between geography, biodiversity, national spending on conservation, governance and cultural traits. Cultural traits and social metrics of modernization correlate positively with national spending on conservation. Further, we show the global distribution of this spending culture is poorly aligned with the distribution of biodiversity. Specifically, biodiversity increases towards the tropics where cultures tend to spend less on conservation, and have higher collectivism, formalized and hierarchical leadership, and weaker governance. Consequently, nations lacking social traits frequently associated with modernization, environmentalism, and conservation spending have the largest component of the Earth's biodiversity. This has significant implications for setting policies and priorities for resource management given that biological diversity is rapidly disappearing and cultural traits change slowly. Therefore, we suggest that natural resource management adapt to and utilize characteristics of existing social organization rather than wait for or promote social values associated with conservation spending. Supporting bio-cultural traditions, engaging leaders to increase conservation commitments, cross-national efforts that complement attributes of cultures, and avoiding interference with nature may work best to conserve nature in collective and hierarchical societies. Spending in modernized nations may be a symbolic response to a symptom of economic development and environmental degradation, and must therefore, be accountable for conservation impact. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 167 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 15 9%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 53 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 27%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#718,861
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#396
of 4,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,083
of 361,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.