↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR/Cas9 PIG-A gene editing in nonhuman primate model demonstrates no intrinsic clonal expansion of PNH HSPCs

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR/Cas9 PIG-A gene editing in nonhuman primate model demonstrates no intrinsic clonal expansion of PNH HSPCs
Published in
Blood, April 2019
DOI 10.1182/blood.2019000800
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tae-Hoon Shin, Eun Jung Baek, Marcus A F Corat, Shirley Chen, Jean-Yves Metais, Aisha A AlJanahi, Yifan Zhou, Robert E Donahue, Kyung-Rok Yu, Cynthia E Dunbar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Computer Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,153,269
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#12,515
of 33,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,319
of 364,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#122
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.