| Title |
Effect of hip angle on neuromuscular activation of the adductor longus and adductor magnus muscles during isometric hip flexion and extension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04150-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takuya Kato, Keigo Taniguchi, Hiroshi Akima, Kohei Watanabe, Yuma Ikeda, Masaki Katayose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,274,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#407
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,730
of 363,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.