↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Recent Advances in the Genetic Dissection of Neural Circuits in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Bulletin, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Correction to: Recent Advances in the Genetic Dissection of Neural Circuits in Drosophila
Published in
Neuroscience Bulletin, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12264-019-00398-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Guo, Yufeng Pan, Zhefeng Gong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#460
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,157
of 354,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.