You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medial artery calcification increases neointimal hyperplasia after balloon injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-44668-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andre P. Marshall, Weifeng Luo, Xue-lin Wang, Tonghui Lin, Yujun Cai, Raul J. Guzman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,961,768
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#64,618
of 125,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,059
of 351,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,716
of 3,123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.