↓ Skip to main content

The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1021-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zach Shipstead, Jade Yonehiro

Abstract

The degree to which visuospatial working memory (VSWM) is separable from working memory in general is an open question. On one hand, the construct is often researched as a unitary, domain-specific system. On the other, there is evidence that VWSM shares a common processing component with verbal memory. One might interpret this shared component as domain-general attention. We used confirmatory factor analysis to demonstrate that VSWM shares a domain-general component with verbal memory tasks and has a domain-specific component that is independent of verbal memory. Furthermore, the domain-general component was found to correlate with reasoning ability in both the visuospatial and verbal domains. The domain-specific component only correlated with reasoning ability when the tests had a strong visuospatial component. We argue that theories of VSWM need to place greater emphasis on its multiply determined nature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 44%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Linguistics 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 36%