You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthcare resource utilization and associated cost analysis of the PROCLAIM study in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Medical Research & Opinion, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/03007995.2019.1623185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramaswamy Govindan, Suresh Senan, Nicolas Dickgreber, Mariano Provencio, Yi-Long Wu, Konstantinos Syrigos, Barbara Parente, Michele Wilson, Ryan Ziemiecki, Nadia Chouaki, Anwar Hossain, Belén San Antonio, Katherine Winfree, Everett E. Vokes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#2,276
of 3,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,656
of 362,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Medical Research & Opinion
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.