↓ Skip to main content

Climate shocks and the timing of migration from Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Population and Environment, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Climate shocks and the timing of migration from Mexico
Published in
Population and Environment, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11111-016-0255-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael J. Nawrotzki, Jack DeWaard

Abstract

Although evidence is increasing that climate shocks influence human migration, it is unclear exactly when people migrate after a climate shock. A climate shock might be followed by an immediate migration response. Alternatively, migration, as an adaptive strategy of last resort, might be delayed and employed only after available in-situ (in-place) adaptive strategies are exhausted. In this paper, we explore the temporally lagged association between a climate shock and future migration. Using multilevel event-history models, we analyze the risk of Mexico-U.S. migration over a seven-year period after a climate shock. Consistent with a delayed response pattern, we find that the risk of migration is low immediately after a climate shock and increases as households pursue and cycle through in-situ adaptive strategies available to them. However, about three years after the climate shock, the risk of migration decreases, suggesting that households are eventually successful in adapting in-situ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 27%
Environmental Science 20 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Population and Environment
#87
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,014
of 302,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population and Environment
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them