You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promise and problems for estimating management costs of marine protected areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00171.x |
| Authors |
Natalie C. Ban, Vanessa Adams, Robert L. Pressey, John Hicks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#847,917
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#311
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,085
of 111,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.