Title |
Protecting the Cerrado: where should we direct efforts for the conservation of bat-plant interactions?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01793-w |
Authors |
H. F. M. Oliveira, N. F. Camargo, Y. Gager, R. L. Muylaert, E. Ramon, R. C. C. Martins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 11% |
Brazil | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
Scientists | 9 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,466,158
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#192
of 2,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,208
of 359,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.