↓ Skip to main content

Community-acquired pneumonia in primary care: clinical assessment and the usability of chest radiography

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community-acquired pneumonia in primary care: clinical assessment and the usability of chest radiography
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, February 2016
DOI 10.3109/02813432.2015.1132889
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.B. Moberg, U. Taléus, P. Garvin, S.-G. Fransson, M. Falk

Abstract

To investigate the diagnostic value of different clinical and laboratory findings in pneumonia and to explore the association between the doctor's degree of suspicion and chest X-ray (CXR) result and to evaluate whether or not CXR should be used routinely in primary care, when available. A three-year prospective study was conducted between September 2011 and December 2014. Two primary care settings in Linköping, Sweden. A total of 103 adult patients with suspected pneumonia in primary care. The physicians recorded results of a standardized medical physical examination, including laboratory results, and rated their suspicion into three degrees. The outcome of the diagnostic variables and the degree of suspicion was compared with the result of CXR. Radiographic pneumonia was reported in 45% of patients. When the physicians were sure of the diagnosis radiographic pneumonia was found in 88% of cases (p < 0.001), when quite sure the frequency of positive CXR was 45%, and when not sure 28%. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 50mg/L were associated with the presence of radiographic pneumonia when the diagnosis was suspected (p < 0.001). This study indicates that CXR can be useful if the physician is not sure of the diagnosis, but when sure one can rely on one's judgement without ordering CXR. Key points There are different guidelines but no consensus on how to manage community-acquired pneumonia in primary care. When the physician is sure of the diagnosis the judgement is reliable without chest X-ray and antibiotics can be safely prescribed. Chest X-ray can be useful in the assessment of pneumonia in primary care, when the physician is not sure of the diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Computer Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,313,489
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
#581
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,956
of 397,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.