↓ Skip to main content

Stable Ultrathin‐Shell Double Emulsions for Controlled Release

Overview of attention for article published in ChemPhysChem, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable Ultrathin‐Shell Double Emulsions for Controlled Release
Published in
ChemPhysChem, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/cphc.201600142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun‐Xia Zhao, Dong Chen, Yue Hui, David A. Weitz, Anton P. J. Middelberg

Abstract

Double emulsions are normally considered as meta-stable systems and this limit in stability can restrict application domain. To enhance stability and hence practical application, the outer shell is converted to a mechanically-strong layer, for example a polymeric layer, thus allowing improved performance. This conversion can be problematic for food and drug applications as toxic solvent is needed to dissolve polymer in the middle phase and high temperature is required to remove solvent. Complexity is also high for example involving UV initiation of polymeric monomer cross-linking. In this study, we report the formation of biocompatible, water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double emulsions with an ultra-thin layer of fish oil. We demonstrate their applications in encapsulation and controlled release of small hydrophilic molecules. Without a trigger, the double emulsions remained stable up to months, and the release of small molecules was extremely slow. In contrast, rapid release was achieved by osmolarity shock, leading to a complete release within 2 h. This work demonstrates the significant potential of double emulsions, and provides new insights into their stability and practical application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 29%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 6 10%
Physics and Astronomy 6 10%
Chemistry 6 10%
Engineering 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,447,592
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from ChemPhysChem
#2,692
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,890
of 300,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemPhysChem
#57
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.