Title |
Responsible Practices in the Wild: An Actor-Network Perspective on Mobile Apps in Learning as Translation(s)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-019-04214-8 |
Authors |
Oliver Laasch, Dirk C. Moosmayer, Frithjof Arp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Lecturer | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 22% |
Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 16% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,023,618
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,474
of 2,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,532
of 353,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#57
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.