↓ Skip to main content

Non-rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: ultrasonographic diagnosis and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ultrasound, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Non-rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: ultrasonographic diagnosis and treatment
Published in
Journal of Ultrasound, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40477-019-00393-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferdinando Draghi, Giulio Cocco, Pascal Lomoro, Chandra Bortolotto, Cosima Schiavone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 24 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,972,463
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ultrasound
#102
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,021
of 368,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ultrasound
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.