↓ Skip to main content

Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
74 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression
Published in
Nature, December 1987
DOI 10.1038/330537a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Leung, Steven A. Spencer, George Cachianes, R. Glenn Hammonds, Carol Collins, William J. Henzel, Ross Barnard, Michael J. Waters, William I. Wood

Abstract

A putative growth hormone receptor from rabbit liver and the growth hormone binding protein from rabbit serum have the same amino-terminal amino-acid sequence, indicating that the binding protein corresponds to the extracellular hormone-binding domain of the liver receptor. The complete amino-acid sequences derived from complementary DNA clones encoding the putative human and rabbit growth hormone receptors are not similar to other known proteins, demonstrating a new class of transmembrane receptors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 87 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Chemistry 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,557,769
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#49,220
of 91,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,767
of 49,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#39
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.