↓ Skip to main content

Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia: Clinically Relevant or Extraneous Research Phenomenon?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia: Clinically Relevant or Extraneous Research Phenomenon?
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11916-010-0171-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Andrew Tompkins, Claudia M. Campbell

Abstract

Opioids have become the unequivocal therapy of choice in treating many varieties of chronic pain. With the increased prescription of opioids, some unintended consequences have occurred. After prolonged opioid exposure, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), the paradoxical effect that opioid therapy may in fact enhance or aggravate preexisting pain, may occur. Over the past several decades, an increasing number of laboratory and clinical reports have suggested lowered pain thresholds and heightened atypical pain unrelated to the original perceived pain sensations as hallmarks of OIH. However, not all evidence supports the clinical importance of OIH, and some question whether the phenomenon exists at all. Here, we present a nonexhaustive, brief review of the recent literature. OIH will be reviewed in terms of preclinical and clinical evidence for and against its existence; recommendations for clinical evaluation and intervention also will be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 16%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 31 27%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,682,878
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#86
of 913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,847
of 193,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.