↓ Skip to main content

Margaret Oakley Dayhoff 1925–1983

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, July 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Margaret Oakley Dayhoff 1925–1983
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, July 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf02459497
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#298
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,515
of 8,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them