| Title |
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-019-0069-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaitlyn Hair, Malcolm R. Macleod, Emily S. Sena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 31% |
| United States | 9 | 14% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 55% |
| Scientists | 20 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 29% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#596,579
of 24,963,265 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#26
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,140
of 359,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,963,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them