You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gut microbiome analysis by post: Evaluation of the optimal method to collect stool samples from infants within a national cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0216557 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgina M. Williams, Sam D. Leary, Nadim J. Ajami, Saranna Chipper Keating, Joseph F. Petrosin, Julian P. Hamilton-Shield, Kathleen M. Gillespie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,135,670
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,537
of 224,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,036
of 369,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#590
of 2,668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.