You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated analysis of environmental and genetic influences on cord blood DNA methylation in new-borns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10461-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darina Czamara, Gökçen Eraslan, Christian M. Page, Jari Lahti, Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen, Esa Hämäläinen, Eero Kajantie, Hannele Laivuori, Pia M. Villa, Rebecca M. Reynolds, Wenche Nystad, Siri E. Håberg, Stephanie J. London, Kieran J. O’Donnell, Elika Garg, Michael J. Meaney, Sonja Entringer, Pathik D. Wadhwa, Claudia Buss, Meaghan J. Jones, David T. S. Lin, Julie L. MacIsaac, Michael S. Kobor, Nastassja Koen, Heather J. Zar, Karestan C. Koenen, Shareefa Dalvie, Dan J. Stein, Ivan Kondofersky, Nikola S. Müller, Fabian J. Theis, Katri Räikkönen, Elisabeth B. Binder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 25% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 68% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Professor | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 22% |
| Unknown | 102 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 13% |
| Psychology | 22 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 118 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,111,831
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,655
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,299
of 371,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#382
of 1,338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.