| Title |
On the presence of Ichniotherium in the Coconino Sandstone (Cisuralian) of the Grand Canyon and remarks on the occupation of deserts by non-amniote tetrapods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PalZ, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12542-019-00450-5 |
| Authors |
Heitor Francischini, Spencer G. Lucas, Sebastian Voigt, Lorenzo Marchetti, Vincent L. Santucci, Cassandra L. Knight, John R. Wood, Paula Dentzien-Dias, Cesar L. Schultz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,906,332
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#70
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,722
of 354,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.