| Title |
Implementation of a peer-led school based smoking prevention programme: a mixed methods process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7112-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Dobbie, Richard Purves, Jennifer McKell, Nadine Dougall, Rona Campbell, James White, Amanda Amos, Laurence Moore, Linda Bauld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 73 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,659,430
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,093
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,243
of 354,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#251
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.