↓ Skip to main content

Conserved mechanism of action of a phosphate analogue in cultured cells

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Conserved mechanism of action of a phosphate analogue in cultured cells
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11010-016-2681-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth G. Frayne

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to further examine a model for the mechanism of action of thio-phosphate in cells using the cultured human cell line HEK 293 and the bacterium E. coli. Previous work has shown that thio-phosphate is incorporated into the nucleic acids of all types of cells and that this modification leads to the stabilization and accumulation of mRNA in vivo. Evidently, competition for translation occurs between cellular mRNAs, due to the limited number of ribosomes in the cell, which impacts the proteins synthesized. In both E. coli and HEK 293 cells, a global shift in the distribution of proteins on 2D gels was observed when cells were grown in the presence of thio-phosphate. In both cases, a significant fraction of the proteins were impacted, namely 17 % in E. coli and 28 % in HEK 293 cells. In general, those proteins originally expressed at lower levels were enhanced while those at higher levels were reduced. In addition, a correlation was observed between the % initial mass and the fold change observed, supporting the idea of a global shift. Furthermore, the potential identity of some proteins spots was obtained by comparisons with computed MW and pI values for known genes. The candidates were cross-referenced with known mRNA half-lives when available. The analysis supports the idea that a preferential accumulation of proteins derived from mRNAs with half-lives less than the cellular mRNA average occurred, at the expense of those proteins derived from mRNAs with half-lives greater than the cellular average. In summary, thio-phosphate is shown to be a useful tool for predictably shifting the distribution of proteins in a variety of cell types. The fold enhancement is typically 5- to 10-fold. Interestingly, there were some proteins elevated more than 20-fold, identifying potential regulatory responses. Some of these were further characterized using LC-MS/MS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,505,252
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,710
of 2,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,739
of 305,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.