↓ Skip to main content

Citronellol, a monoterpene alcohol, reduces nociceptive and inflammatory activities in rodents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Citronellol, a monoterpene alcohol, reduces nociceptive and inflammatory activities in rodents
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11418-012-0632-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renan G. Brito, Adriana G. Guimarães, Jullyana S. S. Quintans, Marcio R. V. Santos, Damião P. De Sousa, Daniel Badaue-Passos, Waldecy de Lucca, Fabíola A. Brito, Emiliano O. Barreto, Aldeídia P. Oliveira, Lucindo J. Quintans

Abstract

We describe the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of citronellol (CT) in rodents. CT, a monoterpene alcohol, is a naturally occurring monoterpene compound prevalent in essential oils of various aromatic plant species, such as Cymbopogon citratus. In mice, when evaluated against acetic-acid-induced abdominal writhing, CT (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced (P < 0.001) the amount of writhing compared to the control group. In the formalin test, CT also significantly inhibited both the early (neurogenic pain) and the late (inflammatory pain) phases of formalin-induced licking (P < 0.001). When assessed in a thermal model of pain, CT (100 mg/kg, i.p.) caused a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the latency response on the hot-plate test. Such results were unlikely to be caused by motor abnormality. The anti-inflammatory activity of CT was investigated through carrageenan-induced pleurisy in mice. Pretreatment with CT was able to inhibit both neutrophil infiltration and the increase in TNF-α level in the exudates from carrageenan-induced pleurisy. In in vitro experiments, CT (1 and 100 μg/ml) also decreased nitric oxide production by LPS-stimulated macrophage. Together, these results indicate that CT is effective as an analgesic compound in various pain models, with its action probably mediated by the inhibition of peripheral mediators as well as central inhibitory mechanisms that could be related to its strong antioxidant effect observed in vitro.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 20%
Chemistry 13 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#300
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,546
of 156,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.