↓ Skip to main content

PAMR: Passive aggressive mean reversion strategy for portfolio selection

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
PAMR: Passive aggressive mean reversion strategy for portfolio selection
Published in
Machine Learning, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10994-012-5281-z
Authors

Bin Li, Peilin Zhao, Steven C. H. Hoi, Vivekanand Gopalkrishnan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 45 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 9%
Engineering 12 9%
Mathematics 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,925,216
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#670
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,133
of 158,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.