↓ Skip to main content

Neurofibromin protein loss in desmoplastic melanoma subtypes: implicating NF1 allelic loss as a distinct genetic driver?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Pathology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurofibromin protein loss in desmoplastic melanoma subtypes: implicating NF1 allelic loss as a distinct genetic driver?
Published in
Human Pathology, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Kadokura, Noah Frydenlund, Dominick A. Leone, Shi Yang, Mai P. Hoang, April Deng, Marier Hernandez-Perez, Asok Biswas, Rajendra Singh, Ron Yaar, Meera Mahalingam

Abstract

Loss of the NF1 allele, coding for the protein neurofibromin, and polymorphism in the proto-oncogene RET (RETp) are purportedly common in desmoplastic melanoma (DM). DM is categorized into pure (PDM) and mixed (MDM) subtypes which differ in prognosis. Most NF1 mutations result in a truncated/absent protein, making immunohistochemical screening for neurofibromin an ideal surrogate for NF1 allelic loss. Using anti-neurofibromin, our aims were to ascertain the incidence of neurofibromin loss in DM subtypes and to evaluate the relationship with RET, perineural invasion (PNI), and established histopathologic prognosticators. A total of 78 archival samples of DM met criteria for inclusion (54 cases of non-DM serving as controls). Immunohistochemistry was performed for neurofibromin, while direct DNA sequencing was used for RETp and BRAF mutation status. Statistical analyses included χ(2)-test as well as Fischer's exact test. Neurofibromin loss was more common in DM than non-DM (69% vs. 54%, P = 0.02). In DM, significant differences in neurofibromin loss were noted in the following: non- head and neck (H&N) vs. H&N biopsy site (88% vs. 55%) and PDM vs. MDM variants (80% vs. 56%). No significant associations were noted with gender, presence of a junctional component, Breslow depth, ulceration, mitoses, host response, RETp, BRAF status, or PNI. RETp was marginally associated with PNI-positive DM versus PNI-negative DM (36 vs. 18%, P = 0.08). Our findings, the largest to date investigating neurofibromin in DM, validate the incidence of NF1 mutations/allelic loss in DM, and suggest that the DM subtypes have distinct genetic drivers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#2,592
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,320
of 314,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#43
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.