You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Annual High-Dose Oral Vitamin D and Falls and Fractures in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2010.594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerrie M. Sanders, Amanda L. Stuart, Elizabeth J. Williamson, Julie A. Simpson, Mark A. Kotowicz, Doris Young, Geoffrey C. Nicholson |
| Abstract |
Improving vitamin D status may be an important modifiable risk factor to reduce falls and fractures; however, adherence to daily supplementation is typically poor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 519 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 12% |
| Other | 50 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 9% |
| Other | 148 | 27% |
| Unknown | 103 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 247 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 9% |
| Unknown | 121 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 277. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#130,995
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,028
of 36,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289
of 104,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.