You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospects for Moxidectin as a New Oral Treatment for Human Scabies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate E. Mounsey, Charlotte Bernigaud, Olivier Chosidow, James S. McCarthy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Georgia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,815,943
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,616
of 9,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,435
of 330,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#86
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.