↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana (2009)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among blood donors at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana (2009)
Published in
BMC Research Notes, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julius Tieroyaare Dongdem, Sylvanus Kampo, Ireneous N Soyiri, Patrick Nsobila Asebga, Juventus B Ziem, Kenneth Sagoe

Abstract

Despite education and availability of drugs and vaccines, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is still the most common severe liver infection in the world accounting for >1 million annual deaths worldwide. Transfusion of infected blood, unprotected sex and mother to child transmission are 3 key transmission routes of HBV in Ghana. There is high incidence of blood demanding health situations in northern Ghana resulting from anemia, accidents, malnutrition, etc. The higher the demand, the higher the possibility of transmitting HBV through infected blood. The aim of the investigation was to estimate the prevalence of HBV in blood donors which will provide justification for interventions that will help minimize or eliminate HBV infection in Ghana.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 214 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 18%
Student > Postgraduate 24 11%
Researcher 14 6%
Lecturer 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 74 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 78 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,724,943
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,116
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,488
of 156,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#39
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.