| Title |
A comparison of the Accuracy of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrienne van Randen, Wytze Laméris, H. Wouter van Es, Hans P. M. van Heesewijk, Bert van Ramshorst, Wim ten Hove, Willem H. Bouma, Maarten S. van Leeuwen, Esteban M. van Keulen, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker, Marja A. Boermeester, on behalf of the OPTIMA study group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,825,962
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#974
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,483
of 122,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.