| Title |
Managing the risk of genetic swamping of a rare and restricted tree
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01201-4 |
| Authors |
Susan Rutherford, Marlien van der Merwe, Peter G. Wilson, Robert M. Kooyman, Maurizio Rossetto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 33% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,436,389
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#250
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,217
of 359,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.