↓ Skip to main content

The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: a critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework

Overview of attention for article published in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 205)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: a critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework
Published in
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, June 2019
DOI 10.1093/irap/lcz010
Authors

Jürgen Haacke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 4 6%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 32 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,758,626
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#38
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,434
of 353,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.