| Title |
The key role of the Northern Mozambique Channel for Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-019-09569-9 |
| Authors |
Emmanuel Chassot, Nathalie Bodin, Fany Sardenne, David Obura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Kenya | 2 | 25% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,469,543
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#308
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,378
of 356,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.