↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a combined essential amino acids/carbohydrate supplementation on muscle mass, architecture and maximal strength following heavy-load training

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Effects of a combined essential amino acids/carbohydrate supplementation on muscle mass, architecture and maximal strength following heavy-load training
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00421-010-1520-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphanie Vieillevoye, Jacques R. Poortmans, Jacques Duchateau, Alain Carpentier

Abstract

Increase in myofibrillar protein accretion can occur in the very early post-exercise period and can be potentiated by ingestion of essential amino acid (EAA). Furthermore, strength exercise induces important disturbances in protein turnover, especially in novice athletes. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of an EAA supplementation on muscle mass, architecture and strength in the early stages of a heavy-load training programme. 29 young males trained during 12 weeks. They were divided into a placebo (PLA) (n = 14) group and an EAA group (n = 15). At baseline, daily food intake and nitrogenous balance were assessed with a food questionnaire over 7 days and two 24-h urine collections. The effect of training on muscle mass was assessed by anthropometric techniques. Muscle thickness and pennation angle were recorded by ultrasonography of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM). Maximal strength during squat and bench press exercises were tested on an isokinetic ergometer. Training resulted in significant increase in muscle mass and strength in both PLA and EAA groups. Positive linear regressions were found between nitrogen balance and increase in muscle mass in the PLA group (P < 0.01, r2 = 0.63) and between the initial strength and the increase in muscle strength in the EAA group (P <0.05, r2 = 0.29). EAA ingestion resulted in greater changes in GM muscle architecture. These data indicate that EAA supplementation has a positive effect on muscle hypertrophy and architecture and that such a nutritional intervention seems to be more effective in subject having lower nitrogen balance and/or lower initial strength.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4,069
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,318
of 105,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#31
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.