↓ Skip to main content

Twelve‐year follow‐up study after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Twelve‐year follow‐up study after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0269-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lien Calus, Nicholas Van Bruaene, Cedric Bosteels, Sarah Dejonckheere, Thibaut Van Zele, Gabrielle Holtappels, Claus Bachert, Philippe Gevaert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 45 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 50 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,268,806
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#205
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,132
of 370,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.