↓ Skip to main content

Impact of using a broad-based multi-institutional approach to build capacity for non-communicable disease research in Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Impact of using a broad-based multi-institutional approach to build capacity for non-communicable disease research in Thailand
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12961-019-0464-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen Potempa, Benjaporn Rajataramya, Debra L. Barton, Naruemol Singha-Dong, Rob Stephenson, Ellen M. L. Smith, Matthew Davis, Ivo Dinov, Benjamin M. Hampstead, James E. Aikens, Laura Saslow, Philip Furspan, Atiya Sarakshetrin, Srijan Pupjain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 38 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 16%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 45 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#638,538
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#40
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,405
of 353,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.